Tuesday, 19 October 2021

RECEIPTS! Patent PROVES Vaxx is Obedience Training Platform

Jab: Scientist Discovers Hatching Eggs, Parasites Birthed After Injection

full movie action final frequency 2021 subtitle indonesia

Friday, 15 October 2021

Job, Benefits, Classes, Rank, Pension, Entertainment GONE Anti-Christ society enforced Job, Benefits, Classes, Rank, Pension, Entertainment GONE

The legacy media misleads Canadians about a teen dying of COVID-19 It’s Fake News Friday

Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Nurses Striking for Truth Freedom Health

Two B.C. women file constitutional challenge of vaccine card

 Senior CAF officer steps aside months into sexual misconduct investigation…

Bali earthquake kills three, injures seven

VANCOUVER — Two British Columbia women who say doctors advised them against getting COVID-19 vaccines have filed a constitutional challenge of the province's vaccine passport.

A petition filed in B.C. Supreme Court says 39-year-old Sarah Webb, who lives in Alberta and B.C., developed an adverse reaction from her first dose of a vaccine in May and ended up in the emergency department of a Calgary hospital six days later.

The court document says Webb's symptoms included fatigue, heart arrhythmias, severe pain and a rash on her arm. It says she received antibiotics but developed further complications the next day and went to another hospital, where a doctor told her she should not get a second vaccine shot.

The petition filed against the attorney general and the Ministry of Health says Leigh Anne Eliason of Maple Ridge, B.C., was told by her doctor that she should not get a COVID-19 vaccine because of the risk of side-effects due to her medical history.

The Attorney General's Ministry responded to a request for comment from both ministries and said the government has not been served in regard to the petition.

"The province and the provincial health officer fully respect British Columbians’ constitutional rights and freedoms," it said in an emailed statement.

"We are taking the steps necessary to address and mitigate the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on all British Columbians. As the issue of proof of vaccination may be before the courts, we are not in a position to comment further."

The petition says both women's physicians have written exemption letters citing their physical disabilities.

Wednesday, 13 October 2021

Clearing Hate, Racism and Fear from Our Planet . 10/13/21

 Let there be light! In the name of the presence of God, which I am, thru the magnetic power of the sacred fire vested in me, I command;

I call to the Higher Selves of all men, woman and children whether reptilian, human or reptilian-human hybrid to step forward into the light.  Cut all the ties Michael the Archangel & Shiva to unbalance, fear of anyone different, patriarchy, genocide, rape, pillage, plunder, incest, greed, power, gladiator mentality, military, war, might is right mentality, from their energy field, cells, atoms, molecules, all the way down to their DNA.  Going backwards and forwards through all their incarnations affecting all ancestors past present and future.  As this energy is released I call the violet flame through them & all their works that are misdirected.  Cut all ties to all black art & negative ceremonies that are being done & any will to manipulate humanity & the earth for greed & profit.  As it is released I call Divine Male/Female consciousness into the reptilian part of their brain.

I ask the Creator to send down the energy of Love from the Pink Ray to be beamed down to all living things on earth and charge that the Angels and Goddess of Love instill in all reptilians - humans the inner knowledge that we are all God and all one.  Then with much Divine Love, transform all humanity to become loving, tolerant, nonjudgmental and non-racist.  We ask that all persons with negative feelings or emotions towards others step into the Violet flame and then onto the Light.  Let all humanity embrace diversity and move into a future of Love and faith in God, themselves and each other.  We send Divine Light to everyone's brains and hearts, extraterrestrial, reptilian and human.


I ask that the energy of racism be removed by Michael the Archangel, cutting the ties with His sword of Blue Flame since the creation of the planet until now.  Let this be trailed by the Violet Fire to transmute all back to Light.  Let those thought-forms be replaced with Divine Love.  I ask the Goddess of Truth into everything on the planet that is trying to hide racism and bring it up to the surface and protect those that are bringing the truth forward.  That she brings forward all secrets and hidden agendas, the Illuminati, Aryan nation, the Antioch Baptist Church, the KKK, Nazi Party, all Dark Politicians, skinheads, etc., are hiding or disguising regarding their practices.  Let all energy veils be removed from humankind so the Divine may again come through.  I command that all persons with negative feelings or emotions towards others, step into the Violet Flame and then onto the Light.

I call Divine Light, Divine Wisdom and Divine Caring/Compassion to everyone's heart now, and direct that energy toward the reptilian part of the brain.  I command Michael to cut all ties and soul memory to reptile/dinosaur energy.  As the Light enters, changing all cells and atoms to divine balancing, both male and female.  See the Violet Flame blaze through the reptilian part of the brain, cleansing and purifying.  Fill the brain up with Divine thoughts, raising all consciousness to Divine, letting kindness, caring and love come through now.  

For those “stuck” beings I ask the creator to shut their reptilian brain down and activate the Divine God brain. We see these beings become an awakened spiritual being that now knows better than to hurt or harm any life form.

I call to the Higher Selves of all life forms and ask that they now see everyone as brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, mothers, fathers, all one family. 

Let the love flow.

Never the less not our will but thy will be done.


join us by clicking on the golden beam gif to the right

Monday, 11 October 2021

The narrative is crumbling. Something bad and big is going on.

David Wilcock: The Culmination -- 4D Activation and Being a Spiritual Wa...


Sunday, 10 October 2021

The Mystical Psychology of God’s Love for Every Human Being and Desire to Help Each and Every One

 Of all things that can be known in the human experience, indeed the greatest of all is the experience of love. No matter how seemingly magnificent and grand anything else in human life may appear to be, it is but a shallow substitute at best for the knowing and experiencing of love.

Love is true wealth, for if you have it in your life you will feel wealthy, even if you do not possess riches in a material or financial sense. If, on the other hand, you have abundant financial and material wealth, but are without love in your life, there is no way that what you have materially can make up for the emptiness or loneliness in your life.

As one passes through life, so many types of experiences are given priority positions in the human mind. Some of these areas are indeed important, in terms of human life experience, but none is as important as love.

As with so many things in life to which a person may be accustomed, loves true value is never fully understood or comprehended by most until such time as a particular expression of love is lost. The real value or worth of love, no matter how great it may appear to be while in the midst of experiencing it, is nothing in comparison to what it seems if it is ever lost, or its position in one’s life is threatened.

Whether in very basic or psychologically complex terms, most expressions or experiences of love can be understood to one degree or another. Similarly, the expression, concept or reality of divine love, or God’s Love, can be simplistic, or it can be very esoteric and intricate. Beyond all questions as to its nature and existence, the most important aspect of divine love or God’s Love is the major difference for good it can have in anyone’s human life experience. Its significance can supersede or go far beyond all other expressions or experiences of love as they are normally lived.

The reasons divine love can surpass and be of far greater importance than all other experiences of love is because it is the eternal love which one can have throughout childhood and on into old age or the latter years of life. It is the one love which, when all other forms of love seem lost or faded, can still prevail and provide warmth and meaning to one’s life. It is the ultimate source or essence from which all other forms of love in human experience come forth. Divine love, or God’s Love, is God or ultimate unity, and ultimate unity is ultimate wholeness or completeness.

Such love can also fill the human soul with peace when one’s life may seem to be in helpless turmoil, since it can heal the emotions. So great can God’s Love be at times in human experience, that along with healing the emotions, it can similarly heal the physical body by exerting the presence of divine love through the mortal or human side of the mind. This is done in such a way that the mind affects the chemistry of the body, and through such an effect, a physical healing is experienced.

Mystics, those who spend their lives in the pursuit of God’s Presence or ultimate reality, also feel that to the degree that one loves oneself, one is capable of first giving love, and then, as a result, receiving love. To the mystic, the ultimate reality, or the selfhood of human nature or existence, is Universal Mind-Spirit. To the mystic, Universal Mind-Spirit, or God, is the true self of selfhood or human beingness and that love is innate or inborn, or part of the nature of the mind at birth, carried to prenatal and to previous lifetimes and ultimately to the origin of life, or God. To the mystic, no such time-space limitations exist, and as a result, ultimate unity, love or God are free of restriction, and thus love is the eternal universal mind-Spirit-body of God, which has been experienced by mystics down through the ages as a field of infinite light.

Think of the Universe for a moment, with its innumerable stars, planets, galaxies, and countless life-forms occupying outer space. God is believed to be there also; omnipresent, not limited to just this one planet we know as earth. Without a mystical understanding, it would seem inconceivable that any presence, Spirit or energy could really care about any one individual. Yet, with this comprehension of the mystic, the reason behind the caring clearly emerges.

For another moment, think about the concept of other dimensions beyond this physical realm and the physical universe just described and reflect that there can be universe upon universe, just as vast as our physical universe, within dimension after dimension and that God is so vast as to be there also.

In absolute reality, there is but one life, Spirit, mind and presence in this Universe, and that is God. Because of this, in absolute, ultimate reality, if you and all others were stripped of all personal concepts of consciousness, everyone would still be conscious, however, the consciousness would be Universal Consciousness, the Mind of God, or God Consciousness. Therefore, in an absolute or ultimate reality, you and everyone else, although most would not have the least awareness of it, are God.

This is the mystical mystery behind why God does hear you, is with you at all times, does love you, does care about you, and does want to help you. As Christ put it, “The Father and I are one.” And this is what is referred to metaphysically as Christ Consciousness, which is the same mentality or awareness that was in Christ, who recognized that ultimately all of life is an expression of the one universal life of God, or love. Indeed, God does love you and desires to help you, so, let go and let your God-Self do the doing!

Saturday, 9 October 2021

Secrets Of The Multi-Billion Dollar Human Trafficking Industry - Sex Sla...

Third Eye Spies (FULL MOVIE)

The Big Lie - How to Enslave the World

Greenpeace's Ex-President - Is Climate Change Fake? - Patrick Moore | Mo...

The wielding of political power by Google and YouTube

No vax pass, no rights? Beaumont mayoral candidate speaks out

What’s the deal with Covid camps in Canada?

 Government denies building internment camps, asks people to be vigilant over rumours

Possibility of the government opening up Covid camps or internment camps has been doing rounds on social media. However, the Prime Minister, Health Canada and other government officials are warning people against believing and spreading misinformation around any such camps,reports burnslake district news.

Earlier last month, Rebel News released a story on a camp in Manitoba that had barbed wires around it. The story caused quite a social media outrage with some people suggesting that the camp was supposed to be an internment camp. However, in a press conference held on Oct. 20, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was asked about whether there was any truth to news of such camps, he said that such reports were part of an effort to “undermine people’s confidence in their institutions, in their democracies.”

Health Canada also tweeted about the issue stating that “Federally designated quarantine sites, typically hotel rooms, are not internment camps.

Canadians will not be forced into COVID-19 internment or containment camps, a spokesperson for Health Minister Patty Hajdu said Tuesday — taking aim at a disinformation campaign that has been circulating on social media for weeks.

List of Internment Camps

Name Date of Opening Date of Closing Description
Montreal, Quebec August 13, 1914 November 30, 1918 Immigration Building
Kingston, Ontario August 18, 1914 November 03, 1917 Fort Henry
Winnipeg, Manitoba September 01, 1914 July 29, 1916 Fort Osborne/Fort Gary
Halifax, Nova Scotia September 08, 1914 October 03, 1918 The Citadel
Vernon, British Columbia September 18, 1914 February 20, 1920 Provincial Government Building
Nanaimo, British Columbia September 20, 1914 September 17, 1915 Provincial Government Building
Brandon, Manitoba September 22, 1914 July 29, 1916 Exhibition Building
Lethbridge, Alberta September 30, 1914 November 07, 1916 Exhibition Building
Petawawa, Ontario December 10, 1914 May 08, 1916 Militia Camp
Toronto, Ontario December 14, 1914 October 02, 1916 Stanley Barracks
Kapuskasing, Ontario December 14, 1914 February 24, 1920 Bunk Houses
Niagara Falls, Ontario December 15, 1914 August 31, 1918 The Armoury
Beauport, Quebec December 28, 1914 June 22, 1916 The Armoury
Spirit Lake, Quebec January 13, 1915 January 28, 1917 Bunk Houses
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario January 13, 1915 June 29, 1918 The Armoury
Amherst, Nova Scotia April 17, 1915 September 27, 1919 Malleable Iron Works (rented)
Valcartier, Quebec April 24, 1915 October 23, 1915 Militia Camp
Monashee-Mara Lake, British Columbia June 02, 1915 July 29, 1917 Tents/Bunkhouses
Fernie/Morrissey, British Columbia June 09, 1915 October 21, 1918 Rented Premises
Banff National Park
Castle Mountain, Alberta,
Cave & Basin, Alberta July 14, 1915 July 15, 1917 Tents Dominion Park Building
Edgewood, British Columbia August 19, 1915 September 23, 1916 Bunk Houses
Field-Otter, British Columbia September 06, 1915 October 23, 1916 Bunk Houses
Jasper, Alberta February 08, 1916 August 31, 1916 Dominion Park Building
Munson, Alberta
Eaton, Saskatchewan October 13, 1918 March 21, 1919 Railway Cars

Vernon Internment Camp house some 1,100 men, women and children
11 died at internment camp
Gwyn Evans - September 19, 2021,reports

Word around town states that retired police officers being reinstated to be in charge of "special operations"in Saskatchewan.

Friday, 8 October 2021

Surgeon General Vivek Murthy spent his time at yesterday's COVID press briefing

 Surgeon General Vivek Murthy spent his time at yesterday's COVID press briefing on a mission to let anyone listening know that vaccine mandates work. "Looking out for one another for our collective health and wellbeing is at the heart of what makes us strong and resilient as a nation," he reminded everyone. So what were his specific three points he wanted everyone to hear, especially those resist to vaccines and mandates? 

Oh Yeah Asshole-we KNOW ABOUT "YOUR" collective.

"And as all of you know, the President recently announced the federal government will be using its authorities and levers to require vaccination for federal workers, healthcare workers, and organizations with a hundred or more employees. I want to make three points today about vaccine requirements," he said. "First vaccine requirements are not new in 1777. President George Washington required soldiers to be inoculated against a small box in the 1800s. Many public schools began to require vaccination for their students during World War II, the U.S. military required their troops to be vaccinated against a number of diseases, including typhoid, tetanus, and yellow fever for years."


Thursday, 7 October 2021






What are the 7 sins in the Bible?

They are typically ordered as: pride, greed, lust, envy, gluttony, wrath, and sloth.











Kari Jobe - Lover Of My Soul (Live/Lyric Video)

Wednesday, 6 October 2021

October 6, 2021 - Part 2: America’s Minuteman Nuclear Missile Program Ha...

Harry Styles - Sign of the Times (Official Video)



Breaking: "Doomsday Has Arrived" / Mike From Around The World / Paul Beg...

China's newest goal


What you're looking at is the most dangerous waterway on earth.


It's where the military showdown between China and the U.S. is playing out. Right now. In real time.


China has one goal: take control of Taiwan. Bloomberg News reported this in  July 7, 2020

 "China's Xi Sets His Sights on Taiwan After Subduing Hong Kong."

And it's getting closer to invading Taiwan every day.


"China is Now in a Prewar Tempo of Political and Military Preparations."

- Foreign Affairs March 14, 2021


An invasion could happen any day.


"US Pacific intel chief warns of likely Chinese Military attack on Taiwan"

- Washington Times July 12, 2021

Canada’s New Parliament Should Prioritize Freedom of Conscience Protection, Says Think Tank

 When Parliament returns this fall it should take steps to better protect freedom of conscience, a vital component in harmonizing diverse views on various social and medical issues in Canada, a new report says.

Titled “Our Inner Guide: Protecting Freedom of Conscience” and published by public policy think tank Cardus, the report emphasizes the importance of freedom of conscience, noting that it appears in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and many other bills of rights.

“Yet, despite its universality, this human right is, by and large, universally neglected by courts, legislatures, and policymakers,” the report says.

“We aim to raise awareness of the importance of freedom of conscience in a liberal democracy and alert Canadians to the pressing need for this human right to be afforded due respect.”

DARK PLANET is CHRIS EVERARD'S latest book. It investigates the NAZI-style stringent laws which were suddenly introduced by many governments around the world - and these laws were introduced even though major health institutes had already declared that COVID19 was NOT, repeat NOT, a major pandemic!

 For the last three years I have been researching a series of TV shows called MEDICAL MAFIA and one of the most frustrating things is when I meet a doctor who is TERRIFIED TO SPEAK THE TRUTH because their mortgage, their household bills, their family and their kids' education all rests on them continuing to receive their salaries... 

In fact, in many cases, doctors actually receive 'BONUS PAYMENTS' from vaccine manufacturers, or they get luxury all-expenses weekend holidays which are dressed-up as 'conferences' on various medical subjects. 


HISTORY PROVES ME TO BE CORRECT. Now is the time to expose these profiteering, lying nerdy arseholes and speak straight: Their 'god' who they believe condones the enslavement of 99% of humanity is obviously EVIL. Secondly, just because they are rich, does not mean they are smarter than we are.

PARANOIA - to the extreme - is a factor which governs their lives. And I believe that this is a crucial time in world history. They have invented fake laws to make it illegal to criticise them. Frankly, NOW is the time to block the NWO. This Coronavirus situation is a MAKE OR BREAK. The 'break' happens when a CRITICAL MASS of people SEE THROUGH THEIR BULLSHIT by SHARING POSTS like this and refusing the mandatory vaccines.

China's Move

 Two weeks ago, I held a briefing about some of the most exciting things happening in the world of high tech right now. I also shared for the first time some video footage of me riding in and researching self-driving cars.

It was a great night, and the best part was the Q&A session towards the end of the briefing. There are always some interesting questions from viewers, and it’s fun to be able to respond in real time to those tuning in.

The best question that night was around what is happening right now in China with regards to cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. The question was about whether or not the moves by the central government would be bad for the industry and if other countries would follow.

This topic has been of interest for years, as China’s central government has been dancing around the issues surrounding cryptocurrencies with restrictions placed here and there on parts of the industry.

But this time is different...

During the last two weeks, China put its foot down. The decision seems absolute. Not only has the central government outlawed cryptocurrency mining completely, but it has declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal.

And the market has responded. Companies and individuals involved in the mining of cryptocurrencies have been dumping their mining rigs onto the market for whatever they can get. Mining operations have moved offshore almost overnight, and those who are going underground are running the risk of very dire consequences.

Does this come as a surprise? Absolutely not. If anything, I was a bit surprised it hadn’t happened sooner.

After all, the blockchain industry is built on distributed, decentralized, censorship-resistant technology that removes the power enabled by centralized control. The ethos and philosophical leaning of the blockchain industry is anathema to how a communist nation-state like China operates – with centralized control and an iron fist.

Why would China risk losing that control by empowering new money to be created? Why would it allow its citizens to transact in money that is not controlled by its central bank? In short, it wouldn’t – and it won’t.

I suspect that there is something to the timing of this announcement. I doubt it is a coincidence. After all, China has been developing and testing its central bank-backed digital currency (CBDC) for years now.

I suspect China is getting ready to launch it, and these latest edicts are intentionally designed to clear the field to prepare the country for a digital Yuan.

That will give the central government even more control than it has today.

Not only will it be able to “print” as much digital currency as it desires… it will be able to “see” and tax every transaction as it sees fit. And with a little imagination, we can envision that digital currency being used to incentivize desired behavior as determined by the Chinese Communist Party.

I can see it now. “Do this to earn a few eYuan, do that and get a few more, do this and pay a steep fine that will be immediately removed from your digital wallet.”

State control embodies absolute power. To anyone who believes in a free, open, and non-discriminatory society, this should be frightening.

And while this all sounds bad, it is actually great for the industry. Prior to the ban, more than 53% of all bitcoin mining was performed by a small handful of companies in China. Theoretically, that could have led to collusion and control of the Bitcoin blockchain. That would not be good.

Almost overnight, the Bitcoin blockchain network became more distributed, and as a result, more resilient. That’s the direction we like to see.

Much of the blockchain industry has also been working toward a “cleaner” infrastructure as well. Blockchain technology is an information technology. It is a network of computing systems, and that means energy is required to run them.

More than 60% of all Chinese cryptocurrency mining was powered by electricity from coal. Needless to say, that’s something that we all want to move away from. Again, the immediate shift out of China into other markets is having a marked improvement on the carbon footprint of these blockchain networks.

This move by China certainly didn’t go unnoticed by the U.S. government.

Days ago, the Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair, Jerome Powell, spoke out clearly in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee that the Fed has no intention to ban cryptocurrencies.

This was followed up yesterday by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler, who also said that the U.S. will not ban cryptocurrencies. The focus of the SEC will simply be to provide consumer protection, tax laws, and anti-money laundering regulations with regards to cryptocurrencies.

Great – then let’s get it done. Now is the time to provide regulatory clarity and, hopefully, a light hand when it comes to regulation around blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.

Pfizer Scientists in Undercover Videos Say Natural Immunity Likely Better Than COVID-19 Vaccination

 A trio of scientists at Pfizer were recorded speaking to undercover reporters about the existence of natural immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19, with one saying employees had been told not to discuss the protection publicly.

Natural immunity refers to the protection people enjoy against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus after recovering from COVID-19.

The company produces the most-used COVID-19 vaccine in the United States. More than 230 million doses have been administered as of Oct. 5. The federal government buys COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson and provides them for free to Americans who get them. The companies have locked in more than $60 billion through 2022 and are poised to make billions more on booster shots.

Friday, 1 October 2021

Lab engineered bioweapon, let loose on the world intentionally by Fauci and friends

 The same folks that lied about the origins of this planned outbreak are making trillions from the various vaccines and killing a lot of people.

There is an aerosol version. it can spray covid upon any surface so as to continue to infect victims.I believe that the Doctors are spraying it in their offices.I had an appointment last week and called first thing,i know I was the first to make an appointment because the prior call I made just seconds before I got an actual person instead of their answer machine.They made me an appointment for 6;15 pm-which I thought was odd-and when I got home,I wasn't feeling so well.

Lab engineered bioweapon, let loose on the world intentionally by Fauci and friends

These dates and events from The Epoch times

2002-2003-In an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), 774 people die worldwide. It’s quickly established that the virus spread from bats to civets and then to people.

2003-After the initial SARS outbreak is quelled, a secondary outbreak in Singapore is linked to a lab accident. It’s also reported that the SARS virus had escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing several times.

2004-Shi Zheng-Li (also known as Shi Zhengli), a director at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, discovers a natural reservoir of coronaviruses in bats living in caves in southern China.

2004-the European Union signs a decree leading to the creation of a biosafety level 4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

2005-Shi’s team uses human SARS antibody tests on bats to determine that “samples from three horseshoe bat species contain antibodies to the SARS virus.”

2005-2010-Shi’s team focuses their research and sampling of coronaviruses from horseshoe bats at Shitou Cave, on the outskirts of Kunming, the capital of Yunnan Province in western China.

2007-Shi and her team write a paper published in the Journal of Virology that shows how horseshoe bat viruses can be manipulated to infect and attack human cells using an HIV-based pseudovirus.

2008-Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance receives its first grant from Fauci’s NIAID: “Risk of Viral Emergence From Bats.” Daszak proposes to “examine the pathogenesis of these new viruses, and a pool of available bat viruses which have not yet emerged in humans.”

2009-the U.S. Agency for International Development establishes the PREDICT program, dedicated to surveilling dangerous animal viruses that could transfer to humans, overseen by Dennis Carroll. The PREDICT program would later form a collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

A diplomatic cable signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recognizes that France is assisting China in setting up the Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety level 4 lab. The cable warns about possible bioweapons research.

2010-Shi and others write a paper reporting additional experiments using live horseshoe bat viruses and an HIV-based pseudovirus to increase SARS-CoV infectiousness for humans.

2011-Construction begins on the biosafety level 4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); his NIAID colleague Gary Nabel; and Francis Collins, director of the related National Institutes of Health (NIH), write “A Flu Virus Risk Worth Taking” for The Washington Post. The article notes that researchers have created a laboratory virus that “does not exist in nature” and that “important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.”

2011-2012-Shi, EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, and others conduct a 12-month survey in a colony of horseshoe bats “at a single location [Shitou Cave] in Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.” They claim the first successful isolation of live coronavirus from bat fecal samples. This research is conflated with research Shi’s team conducted at the Mojiang mine in 2012/2013

2012-2013-Another bat virus causes a second epidemic, known as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). This time the intermediary host animal is camels. More than 840 people die worldwide.

2012-Tian Junhua, a virologist at the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention starts collecting bats from remote locations in China for further study at the Wuhan CDC. Tian would later admit to having captured around 10,000 bats without taking any safety precautions and acknowledge that he was frequently sprayed with bat urine and blood.

Six miners clear bat excrement from a mine in Mojiang County, Yunnan Province, China. They fall ill with COVID-19-like symptoms, and three die. Later, a virus called RaTG13 is isolated from the mine by Shi’s team and sent to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. RaTG13 to this day remains the closest known relative 

of SARS2.

Fauci reports at a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing that NIAID is funding experiments in which viruses are modified to allow for aerosol transmission. Fauci claims that “the risk-benefit ratio of such research clearly tips towards benefitting society.

OCT. 9-After the death of two of the miners from Mojiang, the Wuhan Institute of Virology tests the four survivors. All four have antibodies against a SARS-like coronavirus. A third miner would later die from his illness.

A study, financed by NIAID and published in the journal Science, genetically modifies avian influenza to make it airborne transmissible.

Fauci gives a talk called “The Way Forward in Influenza Research” concerning “the controversial issue of gain-of-function research.” He says, “If we want to continue this important work, we collectively need to do a better job of articulating the scientific rationale for such experiments.”

After testing the miners in May, Shi and her team of scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology collect bat virus samples from the Mojiang mine. These samples are sent back to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for further analysis and storage.

Fauci writes a paper addressing the potential for a lab accident in relation to gain-of-function experiments. Fauci claims “that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”

A master’s thesis completed at Kunming Medical University focuses on a virus that killed three men at the Mojiang mine in 2012 and concludes that the deaths resulted from a SARS-like coronavirus from bats.

The thesis states that Shi’s previous conclusion that the SARS-like coronavirus carried by bats is not contagious to humans is incorrect.

The miners’ deaths appear to have prompted Shi to focus her work on the Mojiang mine, where she would officially discover the closest known relative to COVID-19 on July 24, 2013.

The U.S. Department of Defense funnels $39 million to Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance over a period of 

eight years.

PLOS Pathogens publishes a paper written by Tian of the Wuhan CDC and virologist Edward Holmes on their studies of new types of bat viruses personally collected by Tian.

Holmes would later play a prominent role in promoting the natural origins theory.

The RaTG13 virus is discovered by Shi’s team in the Mojiang mine. The source and location of this closest relative to COVID-19 would later be concealed by Shi.

The Galveston National Laboratory in Texas begins to train Chinese researchers for work in biosafety level 4 labs, supplanting France’s role at the startup of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s new level 4 lab.

Shi, Daszak, and others publish a NIAID-funded study claiming the first successful isolation of a live coronavirus from horseshoe bat fecal samples. Shi’s team names this virus WIV1—apparently shorthand for Wuhan Institute of Virology 1.

A Wuhan Institute of Virology thesis, supervised by Shi, mentions the Mojiang miners incident, noting that “three miners died from pneumonia.” The paper acknowledges that Shi and her team “investigated the virus carried by bats in this cave” and concludes that it “is likely that the six miners were infected with the pathogen carried by bats.”

The thesis is also the first time that RaBtCoV/4991 virus, which would later emerge as COVID-19’s closest relative, is mentioned:

“Overlap PCR was performed on the amplified bat coronavirus N gene, of which 4991, 3740(β)-N was amplified by laboratory associates.”

Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance receives a $3,700,000 NIAID grant to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans.

The work was to be carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

James Le Duc, director of the Galveston National Laboratory, acknowledges that he is training a Chinese researcher from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the maintenance and operations of a level 4 facility. Le Duc also claimed to “have invested considerably in our partnership with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Wuhan [Wuhan Institute of Virology’s parent body] and is anxious to ensure its long-term success.”

The Obama administration announces a moratorium on gain-of-function research. NIH Director Francis Collins states that “these studies, however, also entail biosafety and biosecurity risks, which need to be understood better.”

MARCH-OCTOBER-Physical construction of the Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety level 4 laboratory is completed. The lab was built in collaboration with the French government.

French certification firm pulls out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s biosafety level 4 laboratory project, citing the refusal of the French to supply the Chinese side with “deadly viruses and antivirus suits” that could be used for bioweapons research. The Wuhan Institute of Virology would later ask NIAID for “disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits.”

Gain-of-function experiments take place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This work is detailed in various scientific articles written by Shi and her team from 2015 onward.

Fauci’s NIAID China representative, Chen Ping, emails Fauci’s office to announce her plans to tour the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s new level-4 lab.

That visit was not allowed. Ping would not tour the facility until October 2017.

Shi’s team claims that 3 percent of villagers near Shitou Cave carry antibodies “against SARS-like coronaviruses from bats.”

NOV. 12

NOV. 9-JUNE-A NIAID-funded article in Nature notes that “a SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.” Shi and others observe that some of the viruses that they found “replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells.” The researchers said their work “suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.” No reference to the Mojiang mine or the deceased miners is made.

Another Nature article specifically warns about the risk that bat coronavirus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology may cause a pandemic. Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright tells Nature magazine that ​​“the only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk.”

Shi publishes an article in a Chinese journal that marks the first time she personally admits to having obtained multiple coronaviruses, including the new SARS-like strain, from an abandoned mine in Mojiang. She makes no mention of the miners, whose mysterious illness and deaths led her to the cave. In this same article, Shi admitted that she obtained a virus called RaBtCoV/4991 from the Mojiang mine. Shi later renamed this virus as RaTG13 in early February 2020—just as the COVID-19 pandemic had begun to emerge.

A Chinese doctoral thesis supervised by China’s CDC director, Gao Fu, and assisted by Edward Holmes—who would later become a main promoter of the natural origins narrative—acknowledges the deaths of three miners at the Mojiang mine in April 2012 and confirms that a team from the Wuhan Institute of Virology had subsequently collected bat samples from the mine.

According to a New York Post report, a former EcoHealth Alliance employee claims that Daszak was “approached by the CIA in late 2015.”

LATE 2016

JAN. 9-JAN. 20=Yuan Zhiming of the Wuhan Institute of Virology asks NIAID for “disinfectants for decontamination of airtight suits and surface decontamination indoor decontamination” for use at the Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety level 4 lab. Although the lab had been open for 18 months by this point, Yuan claims that the lab “is under operation without pathogens.”

Pigs in four farms located 60 miles from the original SARS outbreak suffer “from acute vomiting and diarrhea,” and nearly 25,000 die. Researchers later determine that swine acute diarrhea syndrome (SADS) comes from a virus whose genomic sequence is 98 percent identical to that of a coronavirus found in horseshoe bats in a nearby cave.

Wuhan Institute of Virology’s biosafety level 4 lab is accredited by the China National Accreditation Service. The lab would officially open in November 2018.

The French government had refused to certify the lab in 2015 citing bioweapons concerns.

Obama issues a last minute policy guidance that lifts the moratorium he imposed in October 2014 on gain-of-function research.

Fauci’s NIAID representative in China, Chen, sends an internal email calling China’s CDC director Gao Fu a “dear friend.”

MAY 3-OCT. 1-Fauci delivers a keynote speech at Georgetown titled “Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration” stating that “there will be a surprise outbreak.” Fauci also notes that “people should pay attention to natural causes.”

An article published in the journal Nature warns about possible lab leaks from the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 laboratory and also questions whether it will be possible to maintain the required openness of information in China.

A Wuhan Institute of Virology thesis supervised by Shi details how the institute performed experiments, replacing “the S gene without traces” on their WIV1 coronavirus.

WIV1, apparently shorthand for Wuhan Institute of Virology, was first publicly disclosed on Oct. 30, 2013, when Shi, Daszak, and others published a NIAID-funded study claiming the first successful isolation of a live coronavirus (WIV1) from horseshoe bat fecal samples.

A Chinese newspaper article details Tian’s work, including collecting 10,000 bats from remote locations in China for further study at the Wuhan CDC. Tian admits that he collected the bats without taking any safety precautions.

Daszak emails Fauci about bat coronavirus experiments being carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology: “We’re also doing assays to find out if it can infect human cells in the lab.”


FEB. 26-JAN. 19=Fauci’s NIAID representative in China, Chen, is finally allowed to visit the Wuhan lab. While there, Chen is forbidden from taking any photos inside the lab’s facilities.

Shi, Daszak, and others publish NIAID-funded research claiming that horseshoe bats they had collected from the Shitou cave in Yunnan Province were very likely from the same bat population that spawned the SARS coronavirus in 2003. Shi makes no mention of the Mojiang mine where three miners died and where she subsequently collected thousands of bat fecal samples.

The U.S. Embassy in Beijing sends two diplomatic cables warning of Wuhan Institute of Virology’s management and safety. “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory,” one of the cables read.

U.S. Embassy officials visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology level 4 lab in the city of Wuhan several times. Two official warnings are sent back to Washington about “inadequate safety at the lab, which was conducting risky studies on coronaviruses from bats.” The warnings contend that the United States should support the Wuhan Institute of Virology “because its research on bat coronaviruses was important but also dangerous.”

NIAID’s China representative in China, Chen Ping, discovers that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is developing a new type of flu vaccine. The information on the new vaccine is deleted online later that month.

JULY 16-Shi, Daszak, and others write an article published in a Chinese journal noting that “results indicate that some SARSr-CoVs may have high potential to infect human cells, without the necessity for an intermediate host. However, to date, no evidence of direct transmission of SARSr-CoVs from bats to people has been reported.” Their paper does not acknowledge that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had already been conducting experiments to determine whether one of the viruses could “infect human cells in the lab.”

Final visit conducted by U.S. Embassy officials to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where researchers and staff gave U.S. officials an overview of the new biosafety level 4 lab. U.S. officials would later report a lack of trained staff at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

An EcoHealth Alliance funding application, “Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses,” proposes to genetically engineer a “human-specific” furin cleavage site into bat coronaviruses.

For COVID-19, the furin cleavage site would later be shown to be key for the virus’s pathogenicity.

A NIAID-funded study by Shi, Daszak, and others acknowledges the existence of animal facilities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Daszak would later deny that live bats were kept at the institute.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology publishes a statement connecting the institute to funding from the Wellcome Trust headed by Jeremy Farrar, who would later play a crucial role in Fauci’s creation of the natural origins narrative.

JULY-The Wuhan Institute of Virology biosafety level 4 lab officially opens under director Yuan Zhiming.

A NIAID-funded study by Shi and others notes that both SARS and MERS “likely originated in bats.” The report warns that future evolution of bat coronavirus strains “may allow them to cross the species barriers between bats, civets and humans, posing potential health threats.”

A Chinese couple are removed from Canada’s only biosafety level 4 lab after it becomes known that they made unauthorized trips to Wuhan to train scientists and technicians at the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s newly opened biosafety level 4 lab.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology’s database of viral sequences is taken offline in the middle of the night. Later that day, the institute publishes a procurement announcement for “security services” to handle the “registration and reception of foreign personnel.”

The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, a WHO-related organization of 15 politicians and scientists, issues a warning about the possibility for a global pandemic, stating that “the world is not prepared for a fast-moving, virulent respiratory pathogen pandemic.”

The report is based on a Sept. 10, 2019, study prepared by Johns Hopkins for the GPM Board, which includes Fauci, Farrar, and Gao.

OCTOBER-An increase in traffic at hospitals throughout Wuhan occurs at this time. A Harvard Medical School study would later suggest that this may have been because the coronavirus outbreak happened earlier than reported.

OCT. 6–11-A report obtained by NBC in May 2020 suggests there may have been a “hazardous event” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The U.S. Consul General in Wuhan, Russell Westergard, states that “By mid-October 2019, the dedicated team at the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan knew that the city had been struck by what was thought to be an unusually vicious flu season.”

OCT. 7–24-No cellphone activity could be detected in the high-security portion of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, according to a May 2020 NBC report.

The U.S. Agency for International Development abruptly shuts down the PREDICT program, which focused on tracking and monitoring dangerous animal viruses that could transfer to humans. PREDICT had collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In November, “U.S. intelligence officials were warning that a contagion was sweeping through China’s Wuhan region,” according to an April 8, 2020, report by ABC News. An intelligence report by the military’s National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) states that “it could be a cataclysmic event.”

It would later be reported that NCMI concluded that the virus most likely leaked out of a Wuhan lab. NCMI’s conclusion would be included without attribution in the 2021 intelligence community assessment on the virus’s origins.

The disease worsens this month, U.S. Consul General Westergard would later write.

Three lab workers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology are hospitalized with COVID-type symptoms, according to unconfirmed reports published on May 23, 2021. Huang Yanling, a researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, is rumored to be patient zero. Her profile is scrubbed from the institute’s website.The first case of COVID-19 is detected, according to a March 13, 2020 report by South China Morning Post.

A report in The Lancet would later claim that the first known case of COVID-19 occurred on this date, in a patient with no known ties to the Huanan Seafood Market.

A March 2021 WHO report would state that the first known case occurred on Dec. 8, 2019.

MID–DECEMBER-The Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention Bio-Safety Level 2 Lab moves to a new location, just 900 feet from the Huanan Seafood Market. The new location is also adjacent to the hospital where the first group of doctors were infected during the epidemic. The lab is reported to have “kept disease-ridden animals in its labs, including some 605 bats.”

The WHO would later claim that this date saw the emergence of the first known case of COVID-19. This claim would be contradicted by a Lancet study citing Dec. 1, 2019, as the date of the first known case.In an interview at the Nipah Virus International Conference, Daszak confirms that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is experimenting with coronaviruses, some of which “get into human cells 

in the lab.”A video shows Wuhan CDC workers, including Tian, collecting virus samples in bat caves in Hubei Province. The date of the original footage is unknown.Tian has not spoken publicly for more than a year.Wuhan city officials begin to close public schools to control the spread of the disease, Westergard would later note. Westergard’s team passes this information to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing while continuing to monitor the situation.

DEC. 31-DEC. 31-The full genome of COVID-19 is sequenced. The CCP does not share this data with the outside world.

Shi is reportedly informed of a new coronavirus outbreak. Shi claims that “such viruses were most likely to originate in South China” and that she “never expected this kind of thing to happen in Wuhan, in Central China.”

Patient samples arrive at the Wuhan Institute of Virology after the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention detects a novel coronavirus in two hospital patients with atypical pneumonia.

Fifty-nine suspected cases with fever and dry cough begin to be transferred to a designated hospital.

An epidemiological alert is released by the Wuhan local health authority.

JAN. 4-JAN. 1-JAN. 3-Taiwan warns the International Health Regulations (Taiwan is not a member of the World Health Organization [WHO]) that the new disease is transmitted from human to human. Its warning is not shared with other countries.Taiwan also starts monitoring all incoming travelers from Wuhan.

Daszak sends a 19-tweet thread culminating with the claim that human-wildlife-livestock interface is the likely source of the outbreak in Wuhan.

The Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan is shut down.

Chinese officials provide information to the WHO “on the cluster of cases of ‘viral pneumonia of unknown cause’ identified in Wuhan.”

WHO sends a tweet that “China has reported to WHO a cluster of pneumonia cases —with no deaths— in Wuhan, Hubei Province. Investigations are underway to identify the cause of this illness.”


JAN. 12-The Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center’s Zhang Yongzhen and his team publish the COVID-19 genomic sequence on open platforms. According to Holmes, a collaborator of Zhang’s, Chinese and Western scientists obtained the full sequence a week prior, but were pressured by Chinese authorities not to publish it.

Holmes would be listed as a co-author of Kristian Andersen’s Feb. 16, 2020, “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” paper, which promoted the natural origins theory.

Chinese authorities reportedly form “an expert team of physicians, epidemiologists, virologists, and government officials” shortly after the Dec. 31, 2019, alert.

Holmes obtains the full genomic sequence of COVID-19. He does not share it publicly due to pressure from Chinese authorities.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology obtains the genomic sequence of COVID-19.

The laboratory at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center is ordered to close for “rectification,” one day after professor Zhang Yongzhen’s team published the genomic sequence of COVID-19 on open platforms. The closure order was issued by the Shanghai Health Commission.

JAN. 21-WHO posts a tweet citing Chinese authorities as saying there was no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission.

Kristian Andersen sends a tweet praising China’s virus response. Andersen would later take on a prominent role in Fauci’s creation of the natural origins narrative.

Fauci donates Remdesivir samples to China for an experimental clinical trial to test its effectiveness against COVID-19. Remdesivir was developed with taxpayer funds by Fort Detrick scientists and the American pharmaceutical company GILEAD.

The world’s largest banquet, attended by more than 40,000 families, is held in a populous district of Wuhan to celebrate the Chinese New Year.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology registers the Chinese patent for Remdesivir.

JAN. 30-?????Lockdown measures go into effect in Wuhan.

A study is published in The Lancet that shows that three of the first four identified patients–including Patient 1–had no known exposure to the Huanan seafood market. One-third of all known patients had no exposure to the market. The market, which reportedly also sold butchered animal meat, did not sell bats. Chinese authorities would later rule out the market as the source of the pandemic.

The CDC reports the first case of person-to-person transmission in the United States.

The WHO claims person-to-person transmission outside of China has been limited.

The WHO declares the coronavirus outbreak a global public health emergency. Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director of the WHO, says, “The speed with which China detected the outbreak, isolated the virus, sequenced the genome and shared it with WHO and the world are very impressive.”

FEB. 3-President Donald Trump halts flights from China.Andersen tells Fauci’s teleconference group he’s “60 to 70 percent” sure the virus came from a laboratory. Holmes tells the teleconference group he’s “80 percent sure the virus came out of a lab.”

Secret Teleconference Timeline Below.

Biden criticizes Trump’s travel ban in a tweet: “We are in the midst of a crisis with the coronavirus. We need to lead the way with science — not Donald Trump’s record of hysteria, xenophobia, and fear-mongering. He is the worst possible person to lead our country through a global health emergency.”

China officials respond to Trump’s travel ban by claiming that it is “neither based on facts, nor helpful.” “Many countries have offered China help and support through various ways. In contrast, the U.S. comments and actions are neither based on facts, nor helpful at this particular time,” foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said in a statement.

Shi and her collaborators state in a new article that scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had a close match to the virus that causes COVID-19. It would later be discovered that the virus that Shi referenced was actually RaBtCoV/4991, the virus that was taken from the Mojiang mine back in 2012.

FEB. 6-Fauci, Daszak, Andersen, and other scientists are invited to a meeting organized by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to “help determine the origins” of the COVID-19 virus. The meeting is organized on short notice at the request of White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Kelvin Droegemeier. Fauci gives a 10-minute presentation.

Fauci and the other scientists push the natural origins theory but are ultimately ignored by NASEM in a Feb. 6, 2020, response to the White House.

A paper by Chinese researchers Xiao Botao and Xiao Lei states that the coronavirus probably originated from either the Wuhan Institute of Virology or the Wuhan CDC. The authors reveal that the Wuhan CDC, located a mere 900 feet from the Huanan Seafood Market, kept live animals for research. The paper is quickly removed from ResearchGate

In addition to the labs operated by the Wuhan institute, China’s CDC also operates a separate level-2 biosafety lab in Wuhan that was experimenting with bat coronaviruses.

WHO Director Tedros issues his “Report of the Director-General,” which includes a call to “combat the spread of rumours and misinformation.” Tedros states that “social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook, Tencent, and TikTok have also taken steps to limit the spread of misinformation.”

In an article published in the journal Emerging Microbes & Infections, researchers at Wuhan University (separate from the Wuhan Institute of Virology) write that they found a close relative of COVID-19 in a Chinese database called RaBtCoV/4991. It would later be learned that this is the same virus that Shi renamed as RaTG13 two days earlier on Feb. 3, 2020.

Dr. Li Wenliang dies of COVID-19. Li had attempted to warn colleagues about a mysterious new respiratory virus over online forums.

FEB. 16-Andersen, Holmes, Robert Garry, Andrew Rambaut, and Ian Lipkin’s article “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” claiming that the virus has natural origins, is published online.

According to Garry, the first draft of this article was finished on Feb. 1, the same day that Andersen told Fauci’s teleconference group he was “60 to 70 percent” sure the virus came from a laboratory. Holmes told the group at the time that he was “80 percent sure the virus came out of a lab.”

Lipkin, who would later retract his opinion, was the only author who didn’t participate in the Fauci teleconference.

Rutgers University’s Ebright, who had warned about the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2015, tells Caixin that data indicated that either the virus began infecting people naturally or it entered the population due to a lab mishap.

Shi posts on Chinese social media: “The novel 2019 coronavirus is nature punishing the human race for keeping uncivilized living habits. I, Shi Zheng-Li, swear on my life that it has nothing to do with our laboratory. ... 

I advise those who believe and spread rumors from harmful media sources, as well as those who believe the unreliable so-called academic analysis of Indian scholars, to shut their stinking mouths.”

Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping calls for legislation on a new biosecurity law to be accelerated.

Ebright says the lab leak theory cannot and should not be dismissed.

FEB. 24-The Lancet publishes a letter claiming that the coronavirus originated in wildlife and condemning theories of a non-natural origin as conspiracy theories that “do nothing but create fear, rumour, and prejudice.” It would later be revealed that Daszak orchestrated the letter and that 26 out of 27 signatories are linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A number of signatories would later retract their support for the letter.

Chinese military scientists file a patent application for a COVID-19 vaccine. China’s early work on a vaccine raises concerns that China was aware of the virus earlier than publicly acknowledged.

A participant in Fauci’s secret teleconference, Marion Koopmans, admits 

on Dutch TV that coronaviruses were being “changed,” “modified,” and “added to” in China.

Shi tells Scientific American that she initially feared the virus might have come from her lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Shi claims she breathed a sigh of relief when the results came back and none of the sequences matched those of the viruses her team had sampled from bat caves. “That really took a load off my mind ... I had not slept a wink for days.” When asked about the Mojiang mine, Shi states that the miners’ illnesses and deaths stemmed from an unrelated fungal infection.

Trump announces “15 days to slow the spread.”

MARCH 17-University of Innsbruck bioengineer Rossana Segreto notes that the RaBtCoV/4991 virus, which had been in Shi’s possession for seven years, is an exact match for COVID-19’s closest relative. Shi had concealed the source of this virus by renaming it RaTG13 in her Feb. 3, 2020, paper.

Andersen’s Feb. 16, 2020, “Proximal Origin” article is republished in Nature. The article claims that the virus has natural origins. One author would later retract, claiming that he did not know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was working on bat viruses in a lab with insufficient biosafety.

China lifts lockdown on Wuhan.

President Trump suggests he has seen information suggesting that the pandemic started at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

CNBC reports that the intelligence community “is examining whether the virus that caused a global pandemic emerged accidentally from a Chinese research lab studying diseases in bats.” Intelligence agencies have reportedly “ruled-out” that the virus was “man-made.”

APRIL 27-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo suggests that the pandemic started at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci dismisses the possibility of a lab origin 

for the virus, citing Andersen’s “Proximal Origin” paper (see Feb 16, 2020), and claiming not to remember Andersen’s name.

Trump tasks the National Security Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency with looking into the origins of the pandemic. It would later become known that one of the experts consulted by the intelligence community was Daszak.

Trump terminates Daszak’s grant for his research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Despite Trump’s cancellation, Fauci would soon award Daszak a much larger grant, on Aug. 27, 2020

A video is uploaded to YouTube showing dilapidated conditions and waste accumulation on Wuhan Institute of Virology grounds.

MAY 18-During a White House event, Trump again suggests a possible leak at a lab in Wuhan. “When asked whether he had seen evidence that suggested that the virus originated at the Wuhan lab, Trump responded: 'Yes, I have.' When asked about specifics, Trump stated: 'I can’t tell you that. I’m not allowed to tell you that.'”

In addition to the labs operated by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, China’s CDC also operates a separate level-2 biosafety lab in Wuhan that was experimenting on bat coronaviruses.

The U.S. intelligence community issues a statement claiming that the virus likely had “natural origins.”

The Lancet’s editor-in-chief appears on Chinese state-run media, praising the Chinese government’s response to the virus and dismissing lab leak theories.

Fauci says there is no scientific evidence that the virus was made “in a Chinese lab.” He adds that he sees no difference between the virus being brought to a lab and escaping and the virus spilling over in nature.

An internet user locates a 2013 Chinese master’s thesis that references the three deceased Mojiang miners. The thesis reveals that China’s “hero of SARS,” Dr. Zhong Nanshan, was brought in to diagnose the new disease. It concludes that the miners’ death was from a SARS-like coronavirus from horseshoe bats. Additionally, a 2016 Chinese doctoral thesis is 

found that confirms that a team from the Wuhan Institute of Virology collected bat samples from the Mojiang mine.

JULY 15-Samples taken from animals at the Huanan Seafood Market all test negative for SARS-CoV-2. Chinese CDC director Gao Fu states: “At first, we assumed the seafood market might have the virus, but now the market is more like a victim. The novel coronavirus had existed long before.”

Former MI6 head Richard Dearlove says he believes the virus escaped from a Chinese lab and that evidence of the leak has likely been destroyed by the Chinese regime.

In an apparent reference to the deaths of three miners at the Mojiang mine, Shi collaborator Linfa Wang tells National Geographic: “When we have prevented small outbreaks, people don’t care. It doesn’t get media attention. ... In Wuhan, if three people died and it was controlled, would we know it? No. This is happening all the time. It’s just in remote villages where people die. You bury them and end of the story, right?”A paper by European scientists presents evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered.

Shi gives a lengthy statement to Science in which she denies that the virus came from her lab.

NOV. 7-NBC News is the first foreign news organization that is granted access to the Wuhan Institute of Virology since the start of the outbreak. During interviews, officials “strongly [deny] that the virus could have originated at the institute” and claim that “scientists at the institute obtained their first samples of the coronavirus after the disease had begun to spread among the public.”

Daszak denies that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He acknowledges that he worked with the institute for 16 years.

Andersen and Daszak receive large grants from Fauci’s NIAID.

It is unknown why Fauci awarded this new, larger grant to Daszak after his previous grant had been terminated by Trump on April 24, 2020.

Daszak’s cumulative grant funds are reported to total $7.5 million.

Ralph Baric, who co-wrote the NIAID-funded Nov. 2015 paper that triggered warnings about the pandemic risks of the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s experiments, tells Italian TV: ​​“You can engineer a virus without leaving any trace. The answers you are looking for, however, can only be found in the archives of the Wuhan laboratory.”

Daszak celebrates Biden’s win online and looks forward to hitting the baiju (Chinese liquor) with Shi.

JANUARY-During a conference call later aired on Danish TV, the lead origins investigator for the WHO, Peter Ben 

Embarek says the Wuhan CDC was handling coronaviruses “without potentially having the same level of expertise or safety or who knows.”

Embarek would later note that the pandemic “may well have been started by an employee at one of [Wuhan’s] laboratories.”

None of this information is contained in the formal WHO report.

Shi publishes an addendum to her Feb. 3, 2020, article admitting that bat samples collected from 2012 to 2015 were actually from the Mojiang mine. Shi also admits that she renamed RaBtCoV/4991, the closest known relative to COVID-19, to RaTG13 in her Feb. 3, 2020, paper.

Daszak writes in a tweet that no bats were taken to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He later deletes 

the tweet.

The BBC’s China correspondent reports that he was repeatedly thwarted by Chinese authorities from accessing the area of the Mojiang mine.

Embarek gives a press conference in Wuhan 

where he makes the claim that the virus had natural origins. He says that the lab leak hypothesis is “extremely unlikely.”

FEB. 12-Daszak makes informal comments to reporters following the WHO’s Wuhan press conference, stating that the Huanan Seafood Market was the source of the virus.

Tedros says that “all hypotheses are on the table.”

A WSJ article states that the Chinese authorities refused to provide raw data on early COVID-19 cases to WHO investigators.

Roland Wiesendanger of the University of Hamburg publishes a study tracking how bat virus experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology over the past decade aligned with the emergence of COVID-19 from the institute.

The WHO publishes a report titled “WHO-Convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part.” A laboratory incident is considered to be “extremely unlikely.”

Tedros states that he believes the WHO’s assessment was not extensive enough.

The United States and 13 other governments call for a “transparent and independent analysis and evaluation, free from interference and undue influence, of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Former New York Times science editor Nicholas Wade publishes an article laying out the case for a lab leak.It’s reported that congressional Republicans are conducting at least two investigations into the lab leak scenario.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tells a Fox affiliate network that he has “seen enormous evidence that suggests that the most likely initial point of transmission was the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Eighteen prominent scientists, including Shi’s collaborator Ralph Baric, write an open letter in Science calling for the investigation and consideration of the lab leak hypothesis.

Lipkin, co-signatory of Andersen’s “Proximal Origin” letter, says that he has now changed his view on whether the virus came out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology: “It shouldn’t have happened. ... People should not be looking at bat viruses in BSL-2 labs.”

The WSJ reports that the Chinese authorities have set up checkpoints leading to a Yunnan Province mine where three miners died from COVID-19-like symptoms in 2012. A WSJ reporter is detained while mountain biking in the area.

Trump states that he is near certain that the virus leaked from a Wuhan lab.

The Biden administration announces an expanded investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

Former President of the White House Correspondents’ Association Jonathan Karl claims that the lab leak scenario was dismissed by the media because Donald Trump supported it.

JUNE 1-3Embarek tells Danish TV2 that the lab leak hypothesis is likely correct, stating: “A lab employee infected in the field while collecting samples in a bat cave—such a scenario belongs both as a lab-leak hypothesis and as our first hypothesis of direct infection from bat to human. We’ve seen that hypothesis as a likely hypothesis.”

This information is not in the WHO report, and Embarek had previously publicly stated that a lab leak was “extremely unlikely.”

Fauci admits that the virus may have originated from a lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Asked about the virus origins, Secretary of State Antony Blinken calls for China to be “held accountable for what happened” and “for their failure to cooperate.”

Sky News publishes footage from the Wuhan institute of Virology showing that live bats were kept in the institute’s laboratory.

Biden acknowledges at 

the G-7 summit that COVID-19 may be the result of a laboratory experiment gone awry.

JUNE 18-Virologist Jesse Bloom publishes a paper that shows that the Huanan Seafood Market was not the origin of the pandemic. He relies on recovered data that had been deleted from an NIH database at the behest of a Chinese researcher.

The Lancet issues an addendum to the Feb. 19, 2020, “Proximal Origins” letter, clarifying Daszak’s competing interests.

Farrar states that Andersen was initially 60 to 70 percent sure the virus came from a laboratory. Farrar states that Andersen later changed his mind and concluded the virus had natural origins.

Farrar’s claim ignores the fact that Andersen was privately telling Fauci on Jan. 31, 2020, that the virus was engineered while publicly claiming the opposite at the same time.

Andersen was one of several recipients of large grants from Fauci’s NIAID on Aug. 27, 2020.

Embarek’s June 2021 interview is aired on Danish TV. In it, Embarek claims that Chinese scientists and officials withheld information and pressured the WHO’s team to drop the lab leak theory. After a 48-hour discussion with Chinese authorities, they agree to allow the lab leak theory to be mentioned, but only “on the condition we didn’t recommend any specific studies to further that hypothesis” and that it was deemed to be “extremely unlikely.”

None of this information is contained in the formal 

WHO report.The Director of National Intelligence releases a declassified summary of the Intelligence Community’s assessment of the origins of COVID-19. The report fails to come to a conclusion, finding that both a “natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident” are plausible